Prediction of Frew Mcmillan vs Ion Tiriac Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
F. Mcmillan vs I. Tiriac

Frew Mcmillan

RSA

2

Win

Played

2

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Ion Tiriac

ROU

2

Win

Played

2

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Mcmillan 2 - 2 Tiriac

They have played 10 sets in total, with Frew Mcmillan winning 4 and Ion Tiriac winning 6. The last match between Frew Mcmillan and Ion Tiriac was at the Johannesburg, 03-04-1978, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Frew Mcmillan getting the victory 6-2 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Mcmillan	2
Tiriac	2

Last 4 H2H Matches:

(R4) Johannesburg(04-03-78)

Stats

Frew Mcmillan

Ion Tiriac

(R4) Bermuda(09-21-75)

Stats

Frew Mcmillan

Ion Tiriac

(R4) Munich(08-03-70)

Stats

Ion Tiriac

Frew Mcmillan

F. Mcmillan vs I. Tiriac H2H Profile

F. Mcmillan	Stats	I. Tiriac
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
44.14% (196-248)	Career Total W/L	54.28% (241-203)
1	Clay	2
1	Hard	0
2	Titles	5
2	Total H2H Matches	2
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

F. Mcmillan vs I. Tiriac Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Frew Mcmillan has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Ion Tiriac has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Frew Mcmillan, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ion Tiriac has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Frew Mcmillan has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ion Tiriac has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Frew Mcmillan has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Ion Tiriac winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Frew Mcmillan has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 54% (W/L 7/6), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 41% (W/L 48/69). Ion Tiriac has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 163/93), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 40% (W/L 31/46).
Player level: In the last year, Frew Mcmillan has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Ion Tiriac has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Frew Mcmillan winning 2 times and Ion Tiriac being victorious 2 times. They have played 10 sets in total, with Frew Mcmillan winning 4 and Ion Tiriac winning 6.
The last match between Frew Mcmillan and Ion Tiriac was at the Johannesburg, 03-04-1978, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Frew Mcmillan getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Frew Mcmillan has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Ion Tiriac has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Frew Mcmillan has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ion Tiriac has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Frew Mcmillan has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ion Tiriac has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Frew Mcmillan vs Ion Tiriac Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

F. Mcmillan vs I. Tiriac H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

F. Mcmillan	Stats	I. Tiriac
2	H2H Matches Won	2
4	Sets Won	6
38	Games Won	50
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (2/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/2)
0% (0/2)	Best‑of‑5 Win %	100% (2/2)
100% (2/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (2/2)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/2)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/2)

Recent Performance Stats

F. Mcmillan Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Neu Ulm CH - 25-07-1983
R2 Christoph ZipfC. Zipf	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
Johannesburg CH - 04-04-1983
R2 Denys MaasdorpD. Maasdorp	L	6-1 7-5	Stats
Neu Ulm CH - 26-07-1982
R3 Guillermo AuboneG. Aubone	L	7-6 6-4	Stats
Johannesburg CH - 04-04-1982
R2 David SmithD. Smith	L	7-5 3-6 6-2	Stats
Gstaad - 06-07-1981
R3 Ivan DupasquierI. Dupasquier	L	7-5 6-2	Stats

View All

I. Tiriac Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Memphis - 26-02-1979
R3 Sandy MayerS. Mayer	L	6-2 4-6 6-3	Stats
Birmingham - 15-01-1979
R3 Guillermo VilasG. Vilas	L	6-1 6-4	Stats
Hobart - 01-01-1979
R3 Andrew RaeA. Rae	W	6-4 6-3	Stats
R4 Phil DentP. Dent	L	6-7 6-4 6-3	Stats
Australian Open - 26-12-1978
R2 Tony RocheT. Roche	L	6-3 6-0 6-3	Stats

View All

F. Mcmillan vs I. Tiriac Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

F. Mcmillan	Stats	I. Tiriac
44.14% (196/248)	YTD Win/Loss	54.28% (241/203)
45.90% (532/627)	Sets Win/Loss	55.36% (661/533)
48.02% (5322/5760)	Games Win/Loss	52.30% (5923/5401)
43.57% (61/79)	Hard Win/Loss	40.26% (31/46)
41.03% (48/69)	Clay Win/Loss	63.67% (163/93)
41.75% (43/60)	Indoor Hard W/L	37.50% (18/30)
52.11% (37/34)	Grass Win/Loss	46.34% (19/22)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
484.57	Average Opponent Rank	467.84
45.65% (21/25)	Slam W/L	53.49% (23/20)
40.00% (6/9)	Masters W/L	57.14% (12/9)
100.00% (2/0)	Cups W/L	64.44% (29/16)
44.30% (167/210)	Main Tour W/L	52.84% (177/158)
0.00% (0/4)	Challenger W/L	0% (0/0)
42% (148/352)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	51% (140/277)
49% (43/87)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	61% (94/153)
60% (9/15)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	33% (1/3)
45% (70/155)	Deciding Set Win %	39% (43/109)
75% (203/153)	1st Set Won, Won Match	80% (261/209)
25% (203/50)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	19% (261/50)
16% (236/38)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	15% (176/27)